Blog
6 trends shaping the private equity landscape in 2025
5-minute read
January 31, 2025
Blog
5-minute read
January 31, 2025
Last year’s global deal value reached $1.6 trillion, according to Pitchbook, up 11% from 2023. Europe led with a 21% increase vs. North America’s 10% rise. And while the global deal count dropped, the average deal size grew 15% year-over-year to $97 million.
Exits, at $807 billion last year, and economic conditions for fundraising will play a key role in shaping activity in the next 12 months, but the 2025 outlook will depend on several factors.
Based on our work with the top Private Equity (PE) firms globally, here are six industry trends shaping the market this year:
With a focus on liquidity and distributions, we expect to see PE firms reintroduce existing assets to the market in 2025 and start making room for new deals.
Pitchbook data shows a 7% increase in exit value in 2024 over 2023, indicating growing momentum with pent-up demand. The median holding period of all PE assets sold in 2024 dropped below 6 years, from 7 years in 2023—an encouraging signal.
Some promising signs suggest that PE firms can break this exit backlog during 2025:
As PE firms manage exits, we should expect to see some younger assets hit the market too—not only those with longer than typical holds. This will be important to create momentum in the market with high-quality assets, increasing prices and serving as a catalyst for increased deal activity.
Mid-market deal making, while not new, has become increasingly popular as larger PE firms explore this segment due to a slowdown in attractive large-cap deals.
Pitchbook data shows that mid-market deal value is currently tracking at over $350 billion, with exit values rebounding 9.1% year-over-year.
Historically, mid-market companies offer greater opportunities for top-line growth and stronger financial outcomes vs. their mature large cap peers. Often, this is realized through the pursuit of inorganic growth, traditional value creation levers and via the introduction of experienced management teams who can quickly deliver results. With more room for inorganic growth—and lower entry multiples—the mid-market also offers opportunities for value creation in an environment where exit windows may be longer as PE firms look to realize consolidation plays in fragmented sub-sectors.
Mid-market assets founded more recently offer additional opportunities. They are typically built on modern technologies and not inhibited by legacy systems that take considerable time and investment to transform. This makes them more agile and allows PE firms to focus on growth opportunities earlier in the deal cycle, making the potential return at exit far more attractive.
An interesting dynamic we are starting to see is where PE firms are building longer-term relationships with founders and operators who have proven track records. This is particularly relevant in the mid-market, where small, innovative companies have potential to scale and generate wealth for both GPs and their management teams—this presents an interesting alternative for skilled mid-market founders/operators vs. traditional career paths in larger corporate environments.
With global PE firms such as Carlyle, Blackstone and KKR, closing multi-billion-dollar funds targeted at the mid-market, this segment is going to be increasingly attractive in 2025.
PE firms have seen the impact modern technologies can have on both operating and exit values and have expressed keen interest in AI. In 2025, we will see an acceleration.
In part, necessity is the mother of invention, and firms keen to maximize multiples and bring high tenure assets back to market are motivated to explore all forms of value creation. And as capital is released, any technologies that can increase the precision of finding assets and accelerating diligence or helping companies operate better are seen as helpful.
The main questions PE firms are asking are ‘how can AI accelerate and increase the accuracy of diligence?’, how can AI drive 10x value vs. 3x value?’, how best should we organize around AI?’
As such, three themes are emerging:
As the year progresses, we expect to see AI play a stronger role in supporting diligence and aligning of investment theses to clearer outcomes, as investment committees demand increasingly comprehensive value creation plans.
Strong leadership will be a competitive advantage as firms look to create sustained growth and inject much needed technology skills into the end-to-end deal lifecycle.
Talent management is crucial for investment success. In 2025, firms will place even greater emphasis on attracting and retaining talent.
PE firms are also rethinking how to attract top talent for their portfolio companies, for what may feel like a different career path for leaders used to working in large-cap organizations. PE firms understand that solving for talent extends beyond the C-suite through middle management to permeate the entire organization. Incentives and access to personal investment opportunities, being part of a broader network of leaders or access to NED roles, and more portfolio companies at the PE firm are all opportunities that can attract talent.
Aligned incentives are important, not only for executives but the entire team who can share the upside of transactions. Since 2011, KKR has awarded billions in equity to 110,000+ non-senior-management employees across more than 50 portfolio companies.
Selecting the right executive team is vital as the wrong choice significantly sets back an investment. Almost two-thirds of PE leaders (62%) spend considerable or extensive time evaluating leadership as part of diligence. Lack of right leadership ranks among the most difficult challenges to overcome in portfolio company value creation, cited by the majority (55%) of PE leaders.
Good leaders also bring the right culture so it’s likely that 2025 will continue to put talent front of mind.
Specialization is gaining momentum, with PE firms launching more sector-specific funds to capitalize on niche markets.
These funds target sectors like healthcare, technology, renewable energy, infrastructure and consumer, leveraging expertise and establishing a competitive edge that drives superior returns. This approach necessitates that firms think about value in a more evolved way and demand a sectoral depth in both diligence and Operating Partner experience.
For example, Technology and Software business buys have been particularly difficult with slowing demand and increased competition. Software investments have gained share of total investments, with 15–20% of PE and VC capital allocations over the last three years vs. 8–12% from 2011–2017. But assets have been left in tough positions as companies look to innovate, wind down legacy products and trim engineering expenses. The “rule of 40”, where the sum of revenue growth rate and profit margin should be at least 40%, has been challenged. And as many companies grew service businesses adjacent to product offerings, there’s been a dilution in free cash flow and EBITDA.
In the Industrial sector, which has shown a markedly lower decline in transactions from 2022–2023 than other industries, companies face internal challenges such as limited agility, difficulty attracting talent and lagging efficiencies due to underinvestment in technology. Externally, they contend with global competition, supply chain disruptions, shifting consumer preferences and rapid technological advancements. PE firms can catalyze transformation, implementing value creation plans over longer holding periods that combine efficiency gains with future-proofing initiatives to achieve desired exit multiples.
The Health sector provides opportunity too, with 85% of CEOs and 79% of health system leaders seeing substantial or transformative change ahead. PE can infuse necessary capital into smaller healthcare firms needing to undergo meaningful change.
Looking at the distributions to paid-in (DPI) ratio, for vintages up to 2019 sector-specialist funds are outperforming generalist funds. Succeeding in industry specialization will require PE firms to develop deep sectoral expertise, enhance their diligence processes and foster strong leadership. By doing so, they can navigate sector complexities and capitalize on new opportunities, driving significant returns.
While PE firms need to be laser focused on delivering value to their LPs, this is an important moment to apply those same disciplines internally.
Looking to the past can provide valuable lessons for the future. Firms that invested after the dot-com bubble burst achieved substantial returns as markets stabilized, and during the global financial crisis many turned their focus to operational improvements.
Many of those lessons apply here: firms that start earlier with their investment thesis—using due diligence that more completely identifies risk and brings deeper knowledge in the sector, technology and operations—will deliver improved yields without having to cull the portfolio. A few points:
At Accenture, we follow the same advice we give our clients in this time of relentless change: apply our experience in the sectors we serve to ourselves and act with great agility and boldness.
At the fund and GP level, there’s an opportunity for PE to do the same, and bring efficiency and optimization to its own business. Growth ambitions remain large for PE. While PE firms need to be laser focused on delivering value to their LPs, this is an important moment to apply those same disciplines internally. Optimizing fund management services, moving to Global Capability Centers and leveraging managed service models can enable firms to improve compliance and operate more efficiently.
This year presents an opportunity for PE firms to move forward with confidence, but success is based on how the sector responds.
It’s also telling to see what’s not on the radar as PE firms get ready for an anticipated year of activity and we’d always recommend embedding sustainability and I&D within any upcoming change. Because value comes in many forms and while investors need to feel confident in returns, PE firms have a responsibility to grow a sector that can propel these agendas forward.
Written in collaboration with J. Neely, Gary Haywood, Nicole Cohen, Jordan Griffiths, Neto Alexander, Alex Dahlke, Suzie Blinman, Jesper Strømann, Ritchie Hamm, Nathan MacCarter and Steven Browning.